|
Dunlea v Attorney-General () NZCA 84; () 3 NZLR 136; (2000) 18 CRNZ 1; (2000) 5 HRNZ 707 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding breaches of Bill of Rights Act civil claims in tort ==Background== The police were looking for a suspect that had just committed an armed robbery. Police were told that he lived in the "back flat" of an address, and a search warrant was duly drafted. However, when they came to the address, it was hard to determine which was the "back flat", which was unfortunate for the 3 occupants of the front flat, as well as their 3 visitors. The 6 occupants had firearms pointed at them, searched, and forced to lay on the ground, whilst the police proceeded to arrest the armed robbery suspect who was in the other flat. The parties sued the police for breaching the Bill of Rights Act, for unlawful search and detention. The police defended the matter claiming section 71 of the Arms Act immunized them here. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Dunlea v Attorney-General」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|